Operation fly trap

However, all of this wouldnt be possible without the help she received from the kick up Guggenheim Foundation a struggled. That grant helped her begin her fieldwork in 2005. Her fieldwork was conducted in the Pueblos neighborhood in Los Angles, this is where she got inside information from the gang members themselves. She also studied from the Los Angles Police subdivision (LARD), here she befriended a couple of FBI agents that were in charge of Operation vaporize ambuscade. entirely of this fieldwork paved her management In writing a real objective parole.She received individually received both sides of the Issue and wrote this appropriate to give her point of fit on the subject. In her Ellwood she would study the effect of the justice de scatterment and the consequence it has on the community and family of the criminals involved. The time she dog-tired on the inside, with the community of the gangs and the lives they lead, would lead Phillips to question both the succe ss of this operating theater and the methods used to conduct it (Phillips 175).Los Angles was struck with dramatic economical times, the economy was unraveling In every way possible. The economy was hurt by the 011 crisis, depreciating worldwide dollar, d break throughdle of union jobs, bifurcation of the manufacturing sector, ND an unchanging education system (Phillips 7). All of these factors would be reasons of why a good working class citizen would deed to dealing drugs, being a member of a gang, and/or using drugs. Drug money was easy money as one would say.You could arrest stacks of money fast, with shortsighted effort most of the time. The hard part was not getting caught. With the Increase In drug activity hap In Los Angles was the same Increase In prison sentences. It got so rugged that Incarceration became Californians number one industry. It would grow to employ the largest umber of people in the state (Phillips). One of the other important factors that have to d o with the increase in internments was the fact that the state of California waged a war on drugs.The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) went from housing 21 ,539 Inmates In 1978 to 217,444 in 2011, making drug offenders 55% of the BOP population (Phillips 8). Although part of this prison rate Is In fact due to the aggressive policing and harsh sentencing the criminals were given. This do Phillips think and wonder if all of this was part of the solution or only when part of the problem. From her extensive field work she goes on to say that the way the convergence approached the drug problem was in fact producing one of the problems they were act so hard to prevent. Here she needed to take the next step, on the inside. She began this step by living in the neighborhood of Pueblos, which was run by the African American and Hispanic race. She luckily befriended a local named Ben Kaplan and lived at that place with his family. From there she was fitted to get a setoff hand view poin t the ever so popular drug environment. She was also able to see different sides of the spectrum like how he environment affected the families and communities alike. How the laws and actions of the police affected them as well.There use of surveillance, through wiretaps and confidential informants, having a banish impact on the lives of the community. She figures out how the families are shaped through this troth in crime. Phillips research in all of this goes to prove how unbiased her book really is, she practiced true reflexivity. All of her facts are hard facts that she went and lived first hand. She witnessed drug deals, witnessed people snorting cocaine, and dinettes the wiretaps that were given to drug corpuss.All of this information she writes from is rigorously unbiased facts, writing from an etc perspective, her way of co- existing with the people, sitting back and observant them, was how she approached her story. Phillips goes on to write about how the incarceration o f a family member affects the family as a whole. Unintended consequences include threaten or actual eviction, the involvement of child social services, desalination of families, depression in children, and high deathrate rates among already unprotected people (Phillips 20).Arresting a drug dealer for slinging coke may seem like a win for the police but in all reality it causes a increase effect on the rest of the family that will have to deal with. Phillips findings go on to say how the police work unintentionally tears unconnected the family functionalism. The only way to prevent crime is to have a gruelling united family. Operation Fly Trap was the combined effort of the LAP that removed twenty-eight key members of the local, gang-related drug trade. They did a great joke in reducing drug related crimes, however did very little in the gang related activity.Where the police succeed in incarceration rates, they fail in the goal to build a strong community. Phillips perdurable conclusion in this ethnography is that incarceration can lead to change magnitude poverty rates, negative health outcomes, rises in violence, and instability among already vulnerable families. Lastly the importance of manufacturing gangs as iconic, newly federalism villains (Phillips 21). Phillips, Susan A. Operation Fly Trap L. A. Gangs, Drugs, and the Law. N. P. n. P. , n. D. Print. Susan A. Phillips. Susan A Phillips. N. P. , n. D. Web. 26 cot. 2013..